The Inns and Circuits have for very many years been involved in helping pupils and young advocates develop their oral advocacy skills. For the last 25 years training has followed a structured method of teaching known as “The Hampel Method” and this has been largely unchanged and unchallenged as the leading method of advocacy training since its introduction.
The Hampel Method follows a six-step methodology to give a trainee advocate feedback on a specific area of his or her performance.
The stages are as follows:
Identifying one particular aspect of the performance to be addressed.
Reproducing verbatim that identified aspect of the performance.
Explaining why this issue needs to be addressed.
Explaining how to improve this aspect of the performance.
Demonstrating how to apply the remedy to the specific problem.
The trainee performs again, applying the remedy.
The demands for training have increased and more advanced and specialist courses are increasingly being introduced. Towards the end of 2016, the ICCA commissioned a working group comprised of practising trainers from each of the Inns with experience of teaching on courses for Pupils and New Practitioners as well as training new advocacy trainers to review the teaching method. The terms of reference were to:
In conducting their review, the working group, chaired by Stephen Lloyd and comprising David Dabbs (Lincoln’s Inn), HHJ Anthony Leonard QC (Inner Temple), Paul Stanley QC/Bernard Richmond QC (Middle Temple) and Christopher Russell (Gray’s Inn), reviewed written guidance to trainers produced by the Inns and Circuits as well as seeking input from those involved in the delivery of advocacy courses across the UK and internationally.
The working group concluded that the Hampel Method continues to be the bedrock of training for Pupils. For more advanced or specialist courses the Hampel Method remains a sound basis for training however greater flexibility may be necessary to accommodate the higher skill levels of trainees and to meet the objectives of such courses; it was noted that trainers on such programmes are, or should be, experienced teacher trainers who can be relied on to maintain the underlying principles of the Hampel Method even where some relaxation or adaptation is called for.
For further details on the strengths and limitations of the Hampel Method as well as information on it is implemented at Inns, Circuits and overseas training, read the full report.
In April 2019, the ICCA hosted an Advocacy Training Symposium where these issues were further explored.
During a recent visit to the UK, Prof The Hon. George Hampel QC and Her Honour Judge Felicity Hampel SC conducted a seminar to assist trainers with both DVD Reviews, and Advanced Reviews using the new “Hampel 2” method, which has been trialled at various recent courses run by the Inns. The seminar provided an overview of the new method and provided an opportunity for discussion of issues and questions about its implementation, chaired by HHJ Anthony Leonard QC.
The best use of the DVD Review has been a topic of debate for some years, and this session took advantage of George’s presence in the UK to look at this subject more closely and with some practical demonstrations with New Practitioners who had recently taken part in the Inns’ courses.
Professor George Hampel AM QC, along with Her Honour Judge Felicity Hampel SC provided a master class on advocacy for all accredited trainers from the Inns and Circuits. The session included a lecture on the Method and demonstrations on how it can be adopted for different levels.